Wednesday, 1 July 2015

The Screenwriters: Nick Dear

"I was first approached to do it in 2002 I think. (...) I couldn't say Agatha Christie was very high on my reading list. I thought I was much too much of an intellectual for that. I'm now prepared to accept that I might have been too much of a snob because after a dozen years of being associated with the shows, because I have written six of them now for ITV, I think it's very classy entertainment and I'm pleased to be associated with it." (Huffington Post interview, 2013)
Nick Dear (1955-) wrote six adaptations for Poirot between 2003 and 2013. Outside of Poirot, he is known as a BAFTA-winning script writer (for Persuasion, an adaptation of Jane Austen's novel, in 1995). He has also written biographical TV movies on Byron and Beethoven. In 2011, he adapted Mary Shelley's Frankenstein for the stage, directed by Danny Boyle and starring Benedict Cumberbatch and Johnny Lee Miller (the two Sherlocks!). In other words, he was no stranger to literary adaptations when he was asked to adapt Christie's novels.
"Nobody ever grieves for a minute in Christie; 10 seconds of grief, then it's onto the next murder. What we've done with them in the last 10 years is make them rather darker, existentially bleaker, and have Poirot faced sometimes with very difficult moral choices" (Huffington Post interview, 2013)
Dear's first episode was The Hollow, for Series Nine (2003-2004). I know opinion is divided on whether this is a successful adaptation, but I'm rather fond of it. The novel is complex, in the sense that there's a lot of internal monologue. Dear elegantly balances the melancholy with the humour, the seriousness with the eccentricity of our central character. As the quote above shows, Dear's adaptation and that entire 2003-2004 series was the beginning of a new development in the series. I'm one of the supporters of this move. The difficult moral choices would resurface in his last adaptation, not to mention in Murder on the Orient Express and Curtain, adapted by Stewart Harcourt and Kevin Elyot respectively.
"In most of the stories, the proposal is of a world that we recognise in which people behave appropriately and politely, and then very quickly discover that beneath that surface there's all kinds of mayhem." (Huffington Post interview, 2013)
The above quotation could describe several, if not all, Dear's episodes. It also helps to explain his changes to Cards on the Table, which was his next adaptation, for Series Ten (2005-2006). The adaptation certainly centres on mayhem beneath the surface. I think most fans consider this adaptation a deviation too far from the source material. The episode is faithful and almost perfect up until the last half hour. I'm all for updating stories for a modern audience if it's done in a clever and almost unnoticable way, but the added gay subtext just doesn't work here, even if it provides a somewhat understandable motive for murder. Look to Five Little Pigs for an example of when a gay subtext really works.

However, I enjoy the rest of the episode so much that I'm inclined to excuse this peculiar plot change. He writes brilliantly for Suchet and Zoë Wanamaker as Poirot and crime writer Ariadne Oliver (which is probably why four of his six adaptations are Ariadne/Poirot novels).

"There's been a stipulation from ITV, who always produces it, they're always set in the 1930s. So no matter when they are written, we have to set them in the late 30s, just for that style thing that people like so much." (Huffington Post interview, 2013)
Dear's third adaptation was Mrs McGinty's Dead for Series Eleven (2008). As mentioned, Dear really makes the friendship between Poirot and Mrs Oliver work. Of course, a great deal of praise should go to the actors, but Dear manages to condense the novels and make changes without losing out on the excellent chemistry between both the characters and the actors. Once again, the theme of secrets beneath the surface is prominent, and Dear effortlessly shifts the setting from the 1950s to the 1930s (see the quote above).

Three Act Tragedy was Dear's next adaptation, for Series Twelve (2010). Like all (but one) Dear's scripts, it stays remarkably close to its source material. Dear manages to convey the theatricality of the plot as well as the darkening of Poirot's character (as a result of the added friendship with Sir Charles). The more I think of it, Dear is truly the main representative of the change in atmosphere and character study that occurred in the later years of the series.

"To a degree we are looking to 'modernise' the glamour of the story if you like. Not to update it. (...) I say modernise, I don't mean update the story, I mean update the grammar, and sometimes the pace. (...) It's trying not to make them look dated. They are all set in the 1930s, but we try and keep them at the speed that we like to watch TV now." (Huffington Post interview, 2013)
Elephants Can Remember, Dear's seventh adaptation, for Series Thirteen (2013) must have been a real challenge. It was the last Poirot novel Christie wrote, and that shows. I think the adaptation is reasonably successful. The novel is very slow-paced and rather chatty. That wouldn't do for a modern audience, as the above quote shows. It seems Dear's solution was to add the second murder investigation into the Willoughby institute, and that works surprisingly well. Most of the episode is carried by the excellent chemistry between Poirot and Ariadne, however. But the episode is surprisingly faithful, considering the circumstances.

Dead Man's Folly, for Series Thirteen, was Dear's final adaptation. It's his own favourite, as stated in a recent interview, and I'm inclined to agree with him. It flows well, it has some excellent actors and an unbeatable location. Not to mention the fact that it underlines Poirot's evolving morals, seemingly 'allowing' and approving of a murder-suicide - and that's a long way away from the 'I do not approve of murder'-Poirot from the first series.

His last adaptation is perhaps also an example of how Dear, for the most part, was gently modernising Christie's stories without making it seem to obvious (as always, Cards on the Table is the notable exception). The Hollow is 'sexed-up' with a very modern sex scene, but that doesn't intrude on the story and occurs is the result of an embellishment rather than a change to Christie's original. Mrs McGinty's Dead plays up the 'mainiac/weirdo killer' element of the murderer's character, but that's arguably a reasonable interpretation of the character. The same goes for Three Act Tragedy, and to a certain extent Elephants Can Remember. We are used to serial killers, psychopaths and maniacs in our modern crime dramas, so it's no surprise that Dear and the team decide to emphasise those elements in Christie to keep up with its audience - for better or for worse. Dead Man's Folly, finally, emphasises the difficult moral dilemmas in the subtext of some of Christie's later novels, and the later adaptations, but without stretching the source material too far.


  1. I am really enjoying your reviews of Poirot screenwriters. Two questions: 1) Who is your favorite writer on the series? 2) Do you plan on doing more of them?

    1. Hi there! I'm glad to hear that you enjoy the screenwriter reviews!
      1) It's difficult to choose one in particular, because they wrote for very different stages of the series. For instance, I admire Clive Exton for establishing the character and the central 'family unit' of Poirot, Hastings, Japp and Miss Lemon. And I must admit I'm impressed by Mark Gatiss and Ian Hallard, simply because they were given some incredibly challenging 'late Christie' novels to adapt. But I think I have the most respect for Kevin Elyot and Nick Dear.
      2) I hope to do more of these at some point. The thing is, I'm struggling to find the time to continue writng on the blog. Researching, compiling and writing the posts takes more time than I first expected. So I can't say exactly when this will be continued. Suffice to say I haven't forgotten the blog, and I do keep an eye on the comments section.

    2. Hello, I am Theresa Williams After being in relationship with Anderson for years, he broke up with me, I did everything possible to bring him back but all was in vain, I wanted him back so much because of the love I have for him, I begged him with everything, I made promises but he refused. I explained my problem to my friend and she suggested that I should rather contact a spell caster that could help me cast a spell to bring him back but I am the type that never believed in spell, I had no choice than to try it, I mailed the spell caster, and he told me there was no problem that everything will be okay before three days, that my ex will return to me before three days, he cast the spell and surprisingly in the second day, it was around 4pm. My ex called me, I was so surprised, I answered the call and all he said was that he was so sorry for everything that happened that he wanted me to return to him, that he loves me so much. I was so happy and went to him. That was how we started living together happily again. Since then, I have made a promise that anybody I know that has a relationship problem, I would be of help to such a person by referring him or her to the only real and powerful spell caster who helped me with my own problem. His email: {} you can email him if you need his assistance in your relationship or any other Case.
      1) Love Spells
      2) solution and cure to all sickness
      3) Herbal Cure for any disease/sickness
      4) Marriage Spells
      5) Pregnancy spell
      6) Breakup Spells
      7) Death spell
      8.) You want to be promoted in your office
      9) want to satisfy your lover 
      10) Lottery
      Contact this great man if you are having any problem for a lasting solution
      through {}

  2. Thank you for your kind replies (I also posted "Don't give up!" comment). I agree with you, Dear and Elyot are also my favorites. Speaking of Elyot, if you watched his "Marple" adaptations, what do you think of them? Are those as great as his work on "Poirot"? Such a shame that he didn't write more on this series!

    1. I have watched his Marple adaptations. I'm not really qualified to comment on those, because it has been several years since I last read the Marple books. But I must admit I like his Poirot adaptations better. He seemed to 'connect' with Poirot in a much deeper way than Marple. Also, he was, generally, more faithful to the stories when writing for Poirot.

      However, I think it's important to emphasize that he might have been asked to 'spice up' the Marples - more than the Poirots. ITV's Marple adaptations were always supposed to be more jokey, modern and tongue-in-cheek. It is surprising that 'Poirot' didn't go in that direction more than it actually did (e.g. Appointment with Death). I suppose we have Suchet to thank for that.

      Also, I think it is safe to say that his 'Marple' adaptations were the most intriguing of that series. Because I'm not quite as closely acquainted with the Marple stories, I am able to see them as adaptations in their own right, separately from Christie's originals. As such, I actually quite like them.

    2. Thank you, great to hear your thoughts! All the best!

  3. It's interesting - your comment about respecting Dear and Elyot the most. I recently watched Elyot's Marple adaptations (and you are absolutely right, they are far more jokey then Poirots), and his and Dear's Poirots. I used to think that I liked Dear the most, but now, it seems that Elyot is my favorite - I am actually quite sad that he didn't do more Poirots (really, why was Marple more interesting to him?). What are your thoughts?

  4. You know the ins and outs of your business on an intimate level. But when it comes to your wireless technology, you may be left scratching your head. In a technical telecom field — one that needs a skilled professional handling the installation and troubleshooting. This is where a telecom project manager comes onto the scene.

    telco project manager

  5. ISC888 สล็อต ฟรีเครดิต สมัครง่ายรวดเร็วสามารถทำผ่านหน้าเว็บไซต์ได้เลยมีขั้นตอนอธิบายตั้งแต่เริ่มต้นไม่ยุ่งยาก ฝากถอนรวดเร็วด้วยระบบอัตโนมัติ ภายในไม่เกิน 5 นาที.

  6. สวัสดีเหล่านักพนันทุกท่าน เราคือ lsm99 ให้บริการเกมเดิมพันออนไลน์ทุกรูปแบบ ให้ท่านได้เลือกเล่น แทงบอล หวย สล็อต คาสิโน เกมเดิมพันต่างๆ สามารถเข้าใจได้ง่ายๆไม่ยุ่งยาก.

  7. This is a fantastic post. I found this blog to be quite interesting and informative. Continue to share more insightful posts. Also check out Investigation Services Malaysia.

  8. เราคือผู้ให้บริการ Doonungfree ดูหนังออนไลน์ HD ที่กำลังเป็นกระแสนิยมมากที่สุดในตอนนี้ ด้วยระบบภาพ Full HD ลื่นไหล ไม่มีสะดุด ทำให้มีผู้เข้ามาใช้บริการ ดูหนังออนไลน์ฟรี จากเราเป็นจำนวนมาก มีการอัพเดทหนังใหม่ทุกสัปดาห์ และมีหนังให้รับชุมทุกประเภท เพื่อเอาใจคอหนัง ทุกเพศ ทุกวัย เปิดให้บริการตลอด 24 ชั่วโมง

  9. RUAY เว็บไซต์หวยออนไลน์ RUAY เว็บไซต์หวยออนไลน์ NO.1 ระบบมือถือที่ดีที่สุดในประเทศไทย อัตราจ่ายสูงที่สุดบาทละ 900 บาท


About Me

I'm a passionate fan of Poirot, Agatha Christie and the ITV series. If you have any questions, comments, suggestions or requests, please e-mail me at, post a comment on one of my blogs, or get in touch on Twitter @pchronology. (I used to call myself HickoryDickory)